Rear Strut Tower Brace
#1
Former Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oakland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rear Strut Tower Brace
Hey there, quick question:
I used to AutoX my 'teg quite a bit when I lived in Texas, and in keeping up with the Joneses, or in this case my buddy with a Ford Escort ZX-2, I went out and installed a Skunk2 rear strut tower brace. This caused me to have to cut the panelling in the back, and it really look like garbage. I couldn't tell you if it helped or not, because I replaced the front strut tower brace, installed urethane bushings all around and replaced my Ground Control Coilovers with a set of Tein Flex at the same time. I have a feeling the strut tower brace in the rear was more cosmetic and weight saving (the 250 bucks out of my back pocket) than anything. Now that I've got aspirations to bring the car back to some bit of prettiness, though keep it stuck to the asphalt, I think it might be time to ditch it.
Does anyone have any sort of positive or negative thoughts on the rear strut tower brace and advice as to whether it's worth keeping for handling's sake, or ditching for appearances?
I used to AutoX my 'teg quite a bit when I lived in Texas, and in keeping up with the Joneses, or in this case my buddy with a Ford Escort ZX-2, I went out and installed a Skunk2 rear strut tower brace. This caused me to have to cut the panelling in the back, and it really look like garbage. I couldn't tell you if it helped or not, because I replaced the front strut tower brace, installed urethane bushings all around and replaced my Ground Control Coilovers with a set of Tein Flex at the same time. I have a feeling the strut tower brace in the rear was more cosmetic and weight saving (the 250 bucks out of my back pocket) than anything. Now that I've got aspirations to bring the car back to some bit of prettiness, though keep it stuck to the asphalt, I think it might be time to ditch it.
Does anyone have any sort of positive or negative thoughts on the rear strut tower brace and advice as to whether it's worth keeping for handling's sake, or ditching for appearances?
#3
Former Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oakland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DakarM
Now tell us which car you own
It's a '98 Integra GS-R.
It has quite a bit of suspension work done on it already and the car feels pretty neutral with a tendency to slightly understeer when diving into corners (probably more my technique than anything). If I take it to the G-limit in a long sweeping corner, it responds very neutral, with neither under- nor oversteer.
My thinking is take it out and replace it with one of the lower tie bars to compensate. It just really looks like garbage right now.
#4
Honorary Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd leave it in. I was amazed on how a strut bar could do it's job when I purchased a Neuspeed front upper strut bar to replace the EBAY front strut bar that came on my 1991 Civic Si when I purchased it in Feb.
With the EBAY bar in the camber was at -3.5 or so on the front. When I went to put the Neuspeed bar on it didn't line up with the strut bolts. The bolts were 1/2" to the outside of the bar. So I had to jack up the middle of the car and finally got the bar on.
When I went back to get my car realigned the camber went to -2.8 on the front and the car turned in much quicker.
Personally I'd say leave the bar in especially if you plan to autocross it alot. The structure of cars weren't meant to take this much abuse and your frame will suffer and flex.
And who cares if it looks like garbage No one sees the interior when you race. The lower bar is a waste personally.
With the EBAY bar in the camber was at -3.5 or so on the front. When I went to put the Neuspeed bar on it didn't line up with the strut bolts. The bolts were 1/2" to the outside of the bar. So I had to jack up the middle of the car and finally got the bar on.
When I went back to get my car realigned the camber went to -2.8 on the front and the car turned in much quicker.
Personally I'd say leave the bar in especially if you plan to autocross it alot. The structure of cars weren't meant to take this much abuse and your frame will suffer and flex.
And who cares if it looks like garbage No one sees the interior when you race. The lower bar is a waste personally.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page