K&N cone filters really better?
12-04-2002, 08:57 AM
#1
Spec5
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
K&N cone filters really better?
they're obviously more expensive than all the other cone filters... it is actually better? performance, durability... etc... basically are they worth the extra $$
i have a iceman w/ the stock blue filter which I've heard is K&N but isn't the same shape.. longer and more narrow.
i have a iceman w/ the stock blue filter which I've heard is K&N but isn't the same shape.. longer and more narrow.
12-04-2002, 06:54 PM
#4
のんびり～(´ε｀)
http://mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/1/index.html
A'PEXi:thumbup:
All filters were tested on a modified (300ps) JZA70 Toyota Supra for power gains.
To see how the fine particle filtering performance was tested
To see how the fine particle filtering performance was tested
A'PEXi:thumbup:
12-06-2002, 12:13 PM
#9
Need zzzzz's
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think K&N cones do flow and filter better because of the increased surface area and filtering media. Whether or not, you'll see a difference in a relatively stock Honda is up for debate. 