![]() |
|
|||||||
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||||||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
|
jackson supercharger in gsr?
|
|||||||
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Still Water
|
a few questions:
1. How much money are you willing to invest into this set-up? 2. Hp Goals? 3. Track or strip? 4. mods currently? 5. your question, is it turbo vs supercharger? or what we think about Sc on the gsr?
__________________
Team-Maintence. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
|
well...i dont think i can get a turbo cuz of carb and supercharger goes better wit h my setup with dc stainless headers and v2 intake...so like...do u think a sc in a gsr is a good idea or shuld i spend my money on sumtin else...
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
|
uh...money wise? i was gona get sc and then timing retard and hopefull that wuld be it maybe a little bit here and there...but nuttin to seroius...lol
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
How do my taillights look
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Big Buff
Posts: 1,385
|
well, all i know s my neighbor had a 98gsr supercharged and it was ast as hell. broke a lot(don tknow why) but took a lot of cars here. then he moved to NYC and it got jacked. SUX. i thought wih a SC you can run an intercooler. if it were me do that and sell the V2, im sure youll see more HP gains
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 60
|
so you wuld recomend the sc for my gsr? wut does anyone else think....
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Grand Sport-Race
|
that seems to be a controversial subject here in HAN. i think a while back one person said supercharging an import wasnt cool, so now thats the concensus. ive seen the jackson racing supercharger in action on a 2k civic si an it was pretty impressive. turbos leave room for almost endless expansion down the road where SC are very limited for boost options. if you know you can live with only a small amount of upgrade in pressure then go for it. you dont seem to want a turbo so the only other decent alternative would be the SC. your money spent on something else wouldnt give anything close to the gains that come with boost. on top of that, they sound so damn cool...
__________________
double 0 teg....DualOverHeadCam VariableValveTiming+LiftElectronicControl
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
On permanent hiatus
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A forum with actual tech
Posts: 9,716
|
Jackson Racing is notorious for the worst customer service known to man. They don't stand behind their shitty products at all.
Before you consider anything, just read this fine article: http://www.hybridgarage.com/tech/marc-jrsc-after.html |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Acura Nubbins
|
additionally... i've heard that any forced induction (given a high enough whp goal.) in an integra produces an inability to hook up without any decent knowledge of how to launch very frequently....
with a charger you'll have that little bit of time when the turbo doesn't kick in, so when you're driving normal, you'll be all set... with a SC where it's all instant power, it's going to take effect on your driving habits... and probably number of speeding tickets. =P
__________________
-sold- '96 Red GSR: Skunk2 SS, ACT HDSS, Fidanza 7.5lb Flywheel. -now driving- '05 Black WRX STi: Stage2 (Engine Management & Exhaust) |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
:falafelrofl:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 37,959
|
Quote:
__________________
93 MR2 turbo | 16psi intake exhaust
98 Cherokee sport | 5spd 2dr stolen |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
How do my taillights look
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Big Buff
Posts: 1,385
|
all of the SC ive heard sounds like screaming wining babies. its like a super ass loud high pitch,eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. not sure if all the ones i heard were f'ed but thats one reason why i didnt go SC. plus turbo leaves ya a lotta room for more HP
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
On permanent hiatus
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A forum with actual tech
Posts: 9,716
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
:falafelrofl:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Trenton, NJ
Posts: 37,959
|
Quote:
![]() it's called a blower for a reason.
__________________
93 MR2 turbo | 16psi intake exhaust
98 Cherokee sport | 5spd 2dr stolen |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
How do my taillights look
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Big Buff
Posts: 1,385
|
still dont like the sound
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I need sleep...
|
Nothing wrong with putting a SC on a GSR. However, there is more to it than just simply bolting it up. Plan to spend a good amount of time and money tuning the car to ensure that the car runs properly under all conditions. You do not want to be leaning your car out when you reach VTEC.
__________________
-Tom 00 Integra GSR 96 Accord EX |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Resident Ninja-photo'er
|
not to mention the fact that the TB is moved about 6-8 inches over so ur gunna have to give ur intake some love w/ the old hacksaw...and yeah it's fun but once u reach a certain point...u run out of options and mods
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 61
|
Personally, I think superchargers sound bad as hell. I wouldnt mess with a guy if I heard his car whine like that. There are plenty of options for superchargers, just not as many as turbos. You can still have a ton of fun with your no-lag boosted set up even though you may not have the growing potential of a turbo. I say go for it and have a blast.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
I'm a living organ donor.
|
Quote:
As far as being limited on boost options on a supercharger, a simple pulley swap will give you the added boost that you need. Keep in mind that a supercharger does have it's limitations how my many rpms (not engine rpms, but supercharger rpms) it can spin. If you are reaching the maximum rpms that a supercharger can be spun, it's best to upgrade your supercharger as you do not want to over-spin the supercharger as damage may occur and it will lose it's efficiency.
__________________
'95 Pontiac Firebird Formula: 771 rwhp/682 rwtq '01 Acura Integra GS-R: 148 whp/120 wtq '91 GMC Sonoma 4x4: 165 hp '05 Kawasaki Ultra 150: 180 hp '96 Arctic Cat Cougar 550: 90 hp |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
I'm a living organ donor.
|
Quote:
This street driven (no cage, a/c, cruise control, sub, amp, etc.) supercharged '95 Formula makes 770 rwhp and 682 rwtq with 22 psi from a Procharger F1. This is my other car.The videos are a little dark. You'll have to brighten up the video to see it a little better. ![]() Here's some boost for ya. Watch the front end lift. http://www.flp2win.com/video_library/mitchscar4.mpg Getting tuned with F.A.S.T. by my good friend, Dan Bills of Finish Line Performance. http://www.flp2win.com/video_library/mitchscar3.mpg Nothing like pegging the boost gauge. http://www.flp2win.com/video_library/mitchscar4.mpg
__________________
'95 Pontiac Firebird Formula: 771 rwhp/682 rwtq '01 Acura Integra GS-R: 148 whp/120 wtq '91 GMC Sonoma 4x4: 165 hp '05 Kawasaki Ultra 150: 180 hp '96 Arctic Cat Cougar 550: 90 hp |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Keeping the faith...
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Left Lane
Posts: 53,721
|
Let's keep this relevant to the Integra, please. Thank you.
And I'd like to go on record briefly: * Aside from the horror story about Moss Motors being less than stellar with regard to servicing and supporting the JRSC line, there aren't any drastic fundamental flaws with the idea of using a positive-displacement Roots or Eaton-type supercharger on a B-series motor. * That said, the centrifugal superchargers (Vortech being a good example) have had rather poor results with the B-series. They add significant power on the top end, but do little to help torque off the line. Conversely, they work beautifully on small-block V8s, as they aid high-rpm power (where OHV motors tend to get a little wheezy.)
__________________
david :: supermoderator :: HAN Integra FAQ: Borderline antique, but still useful. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
I'm a living organ donor.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Keeping the faith...
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Left Lane
Posts: 53,721
|
Quote:
It's the vids that made me raise the issue. We don't want to start comparing apples to oranges... a centrifugal SC will have very different results with our dinky little fours.
__________________
david :: supermoderator :: HAN Integra FAQ: Borderline antique, but still useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned
|
i didnt know SCs were carb legal...r they?
wat kind of SC has a good gain for our little b-series? |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Keeping the faith...
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Left Lane
Posts: 53,721
|
Quote:
I was considering one for my DC4, but decided it wasn't worth the $3K invesment in a wrong-wheel drive platform.
__________________
david :: supermoderator :: HAN Integra FAQ: Borderline antique, but still useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
I'm a living organ donor.
|
Quote:
Procharger Sport Compact http://www.procharger.com/SPORT_COMP..._compact.shtml ![]()
__________________
'95 Pontiac Firebird Formula: 771 rwhp/682 rwtq '01 Acura Integra GS-R: 148 whp/120 wtq '91 GMC Sonoma 4x4: 165 hp '05 Kawasaki Ultra 150: 180 hp '96 Arctic Cat Cougar 550: 90 hp |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Keeping the faith...
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Left Lane
Posts: 53,721
|
Quote:
OTOH, I'm biased in favor of the positive displacement blowers. As I spend more time in my VTEC-deprived DC4, I'm becoming a bigger fan of useable torque down low. The thought of waiting for 4000rpm or so isn't my cup of tea. ![]() Hell, I'm already looking at a replacement for the DC4. Hint: it has a V8.
__________________
david :: supermoderator :: HAN Integra FAQ: Borderline antique, but still useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
no ![]() so is the jackson racing kit carb legal? edit: nvm it is, i was at their site and saw this graph ![]() im guessing the line that starts from the bottom is the supercharged b18, but y is it so low compared to a stock b18? i thought superchargers helped in the low end... |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
I'm a living organ donor.
|
I my eyes, I don't want a lot of low end torque being that these cars will just spin the tires off of the line. Currently, my GS-R has terrible 60 foot times. I guess I am spoiled with getting 1.4 60 foot times with my Firebird.
Granted, I haven't done anything to the suspension as I like the way my Integra rides now. But these cars aren't going to get good 60 foot times anyway (compared to what I get with my Firebird). What's a good 60 foot time for one of these cars away? 2.0 seconds? I'd be willing to sacrifice a little low end grunt as it won't be put to the pavement very well anyway. What good is any power if you can't put it down on the pavement?
__________________
'95 Pontiac Firebird Formula: 771 rwhp/682 rwtq '01 Acura Integra GS-R: 148 whp/120 wtq '91 GMC Sonoma 4x4: 165 hp '05 Kawasaki Ultra 150: 180 hp '96 Arctic Cat Cougar 550: 90 hp |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned
|
could anyone with SC experience please pm or tell me who r u so i could pm u?
only tell me if u want to help
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
www.ufc.com
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 2,920
|
Vortech makes one for civic and integra too. Just a thought...
__________________
"Time Makes Everyone Tap." |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|