gsr in a 97 2.2 cl?
10-06-2005, 04:51 PM
#2
Change sig? Lose [quote]!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL is a body of an Accord Coupe. It's like putting a GS-R in an Accord coupe. The horsepower and weight savings are nice, but having about 20 less ft-lb/tq would succccckkkk
10-06-2005, 08:34 PM
#3
On permanent hiatus
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A forum with actual tech
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2.2CLs are bricks. If you are going to spend that much on the GSR engine, at least put it into a chassis that would benefit from it being there instead of wasting it on a chassis that is way too heavy.
10-06-2005, 08:57 PM
#4
Change sig? Lose [quote]!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not to mention that the GS-R doesn't build sufficient torque for a 2,8XXlb car until almost redline.
Those F-series engines make their maximum torque around 4,800 (The F23 does) with plenty around 3,000. I think you'd be constantly revving to 5,000+ in normal traffic just to keep up.
Those F-series engines make their maximum torque around 4,800 (The F23 does) with plenty around 3,000. I think you'd be constantly revving to 5,000+ in normal traffic just to keep up.