Notices

Teg vs DSM

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-01-2005, 09:20 PM
  #1  
gingas
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
gingas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: White Plains, MD
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Teg vs DSM

First let me say Eclipse 1G & 2G & Talon 1 & 2 G came with AWD.
Second, 1G Eclipse are better than 2G's. 3 reasons:Bigger Turbo,better blowoff valve & bigger throttle body.I use to have a 90 GSX & ran a 14'9 stock.
I wouldn't try to run a DSM at the track heads up, mainly AWD because no Honda/Acura can sit there & launch at 5K Rpm & get a good time w/ out spinning tires. Not to knock you champ but GS,LS & Rs's are slow.
Not even close to a Gsr or R. One important thing please go to a track & race not in the streets.
Old 06-01-2005, 09:55 PM
  #2  
M@rshy
٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
 
M@rshy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 21,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you hit the wrong button bud...
Old 06-01-2005, 10:40 PM
  #3  
Provocateur
On permanent hiatus
 
Provocateur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A forum with actual tech
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What's your point?

Strip the turbo off the GSX and we will see who has the advantage now.

I think you posted this in the wrong forum, because it makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Old 06-01-2005, 11:21 PM
  #4  
JDMDB1
Registered Abuser
 
JDMDB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tegs are still sexier
Old 06-01-2005, 11:54 PM
  #5  
Integral
Nightmare Motorsports
 
Integral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Indeed, and dsm's dieeee, not as reliable as honda/acuras ;p
Old 06-02-2005, 01:41 AM
  #6  
shabacash
I'M SO JDM, I HAVE SARS
 
shabacash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: badalandbad
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cock and balls to DSMs
Old 06-02-2005, 04:36 AM
  #7  
flyromeo3
 
flyromeo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bethlehem PA
Posts: 6,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what a dork.......your comparing a turbo powered car to a N/A car.

I think 14.9 in the 1/4 is slow any on a turbo'd car.
Old 06-02-2005, 05:44 AM
  #8  
TeHJuSTiN
NAM #0001
 
TeHJuSTiN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shmoo
Strip the turbo off the GSX and we will see who has the advantage now.
Comparing apples and oranges.
Old 06-02-2005, 06:09 AM
  #9  
SP00NFed
FuK JDM
 
SP00NFed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Left Lane, CT
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah i think gingas is in the wrong forum.....

:closed:
Old 06-02-2005, 09:02 AM
  #10  
RDN
Red Dragon Nitro
 
RDN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gingas
First let me say Eclipse 1G & 2G & Talon 1 & 2 G came with AWD.
Second, 1G Eclipse are better than 2G's. 3 reasons:Bigger Turbo,better blowoff valve & bigger throttle body.I use to have a 90 GSX & ran a 14'9 stock.
I wouldn't try to run a DSM at the track heads up, mainly AWD because no Honda/Acura can sit there & launch at 5K Rpm & get a good time w/ out spinning tires. Not to knock you champ but GS,LS & Rs's are slow.
Not even close to a Gsr or R. One important thing please go to a track & race not in the streets.
Wha? Who are you talking to? What's your point?




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:42 PM.