thoughts on J's intake
07-24-2003, 07:35 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by jonesdx
bump someone has to have this or heard of it
It's a weird looking thing, but has a good reputation. On some installations, it seems to rub against the strut bar and wear itself.
In some recent tests, Steve Sakai was surprised how well it did on the dyno. It's on some Honda Challenge cars, and the people who use it praise it for its throttle response.
07-24-2003, 07:51 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by jonesdx
just wanted anyone thoughts on the J's intake compared to others such as mugen, aem, comptech. Any info would be cool
BTW tried search function
BTW tried search function
07-25-2003, 06:59 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pros: Throttle response, increased midrange, 3k/6k rpm resonance spikes.
Cons: Cost (cf version), rubs everything around it, needs cold air ducting to be more efficient.
Better than the AEM, comparable to the icebox, Mugen 0wnz all.
Cons: Cost (cf version), rubs everything around it, needs cold air ducting to be more efficient.
Better than the AEM, comparable to the icebox, Mugen 0wnz all.
