![]() |
|
|||||||
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||||||||
|
HC Racer H5
|
Honda Fit Info
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
||||||||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Remarks by Dick Colliver, re: NAIAS Honda Fit Intro
New Honda Fit Announcement
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Edmunds InsideLine Future Vehicle
Link to Article
Quote:
![]()
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
AC: 2007 Honda Fit: New Subcompact for America
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Edmunds Inside Line - Japanese Honda Fit
Link to Article
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Honda Announces Pricing for All-New 2007 Fit
Link to Press Release
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
S2K compatible
|
i'm going to the ride and drive in alameda on apr. 4'th. i'll report back.
__________________
WTB - 98+ GSR or 97+ prelude 5-spd, $7000 my rides: 95 integra LS, milano pink 99 FZR (it RUNS!!!) 94 accord ex coupe 5-spd (girl's car now) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Wallpaper
![]() ![]()
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
2007 Honda Fit - Chassis
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hopeful FIT owner
|
One of the things I've read from every review so far is that the Fit has surprisingly good handling. The reason is simple: by putting the fuel tank under the front seats, this drastically lowers the center of gravity compared to a traditional rear-mounted fuel tank, a major contributing factor in improving overall handling. Car and Driver in its May 2006 issue said in its comparison of seven subcompact cars that the Fit was the only car in test with really good handling, and in fact did a lane change test at an amazingly fast speed.
Put in a set of 205/45R16 tires and a good suspension upgrade kit from either Mugen, HKS, Spoon, etc. and the Fit could probably keep up with the current Mini on a handling course!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
2007 Honda Fit Powertrain
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
2007 Honda Fit Interior
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Edmunds Inside Line: Full Test Honda Fit
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
The Car Connection: Honda Fit Review
Link
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Car & Driver: $15,000 Cheap Skates
Link
![]() Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Business Week Article on Honda Fit
Will Honda's Fit Be A Hit?
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Fit Has Makings of a Hit
Article from Ward's Auto
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Nice Fit
BusinessWeek Article on the Honda Fit
Quote:
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5
|
My site currently has real-world fuel-economy and pricing for the Honda Fit. Reliability data once I have enough Fit owners participating (18 signed up to participate as I write this).
My site's page for the Fit: Honda Fit price comparisons, fuel economy, and reliability
__________________
www.truedelta.com Price comparisons, quick and thorough Next: more useful reliability information |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
HC Racer H5
|
Honda Fit vs. Nissan Versa
Link
[quote=AutoWeek]Honda Fit [base model] vs. Nissan Versa [SL model] AutoWeek Published 11/27/06 With a bevy of B-class cars from the Chevrolet Aveo to the Toyota Yaris hitting the street in numbers, we thought it a good time to pit two of the best examples against each other and let them duke it out for the title of Best of the Bs. The Nissan Versa and Honda Fit are both as good as the segment gets, but that’s not enough for us, at least from a DoubleTake standpoint. We want, nay, need a winner, so we dragged each to our testing facility in perpetually sunny Southern California to thrash the bejeebers out of both. And after feeding the resulting data into the AutoWeek ENIAC and filtering through punch cards, we’ve deemed one victorious. But that’s for later. Though diminutive in size, both cars deliver efficient designs wrapped in small but smartly styled packages. The Nissan, in hatchback form, provides 94.4 cubic feet of passenger volume for five. That’s just 2.1 cubic feet shy of a sunroof-equipped Infiniti G35 sedan, for example. The cargo space eclipses the G35’s, with 16.9 cubic feet of grocery-hauling capacity to the Infiniti’s meager 13.5. Flip down the folding rear seats of the little hatchback and cargo jumps to a whopping 50.4 cubic feet. Likewise, the Honda Fit seats five with a total of 90.1 cubic feet of passenger volume. Rear-seat legroom suffers a bit compared with the Versa’s, at 33.7 inches to the Nissan’s capacious 38.0. But there’s more cargo space behind the rear seats, at 21.3 cubic feet, even if that advantage diminishes once the seats are folded, to 41.9. Rear seat and cargo room in the Fit fall short of the Versa, due mainly to the Honda’s shorter wheelbase and overall length. At 157.4 inches long, the Fit gives up 11.7 inches of length to the Nissan; with its wheels pushed farther out to the corners, however, the Honda’s wheelbase makes up some of the deficit, at 96.5 inches to the Versa’s 102.4. Both cars use independent MacPherson strut front suspension setups and rear torsion-beam configurations with antiroll bars. Both also feature front vented disc brakes, the Versa’s measuring 11.02 inches in diameter to the Fit’s 10.3-inchers, and rear drum brakes. On the road, both cars exhibit decent road isolation, though we did detect a few minor trim rattles from the Honda’s dashboard when hitting larger bumps. The front suspension on the Honda also felt a bit softer than the Nissan’s, though we never felt any sort of freeway hop from either. And neither car demonstrated outstanding straight-line stability, both front-drivers tending to track along with freeway grooves and requiring the driver to maintain regular steering corrections. We found both interiors well laid out, with the materials used in both of a decent quality. We give the nod to the Versa in this category, as the Fit did have a few cheap, shiny plastic parts sprinkled about. The Nissan felt a bit better put together as well, though the Honda did a better job of noise isolation, both at idle and at maximum first-gear revs. Under the hood, the Fit makes do with a five-speed manual transmission and 1.5-liter inline-four, a single-overhead-cam design utilizing Honda’s signature VTEC technology to pump out 109 horses and 105 lb-ft of torque. The Versa, however, trumps the Honda’s output, turning out 122 hp and 127 lb-ft from its larger 1.8-liter dual-cam four mated to a six-speed manual. Much of that power advantage unfortunately gets eaten up by the Versa’s significantly higher curb weight, at 2722 pounds compared to the Fit’s 2432. Perhaps partly due to its weight advantage, the Fit managed a hair-thin advantage in off-the-line performance at the track, reaching 60 mph from a standstill in 9.3 seconds to the Versa’s 9.33. By the time both hit the quarter-mile sticks, the Versa made up for the slightly slower start—due to its shorter fourth gear and significantly superior 60-to-80-mph split time—reaching a top speed of 81.6 mph in 16.99 seconds compared to the Fit’s slower but quicker 79.9 mph in 16.92. Through the slalom course, we found the Honda understeered noticeably less than the Nissan, allowing for the throttle to remain planted through most of the run. Its best runs came when driven fairly gently. Overall, we found the Fit incredibly easy to maneuver through the cones; the entire exercise involved just flicking the steering wheel and waiting for the response. The Versa, on the other hand, felt underpowered in the slalom, requiring much more throttle modulation through the early cones and a more aggressive approach overall. The Nissan would lose too much momentum too quickly with the smoother, less-involved technique we used with the Honda. The quickest run we achieved in the Nissan, at 42.3 mph, fell far short of the Honda’s 44.2 mph. Likewise, the Fit displayed a perfectly controlled demeanor on the skidpad, requiring the driver to simply hold the steering wheel steady and steer with the gas pedal to achieve 0.74 g of lateral acceleration. The Versa, on the other hand, while as easy to direct around the 200-foot diameter circle as the Fit, delivered far less feel, with a sort of disconnect between the tires and the steering wheel, where the Honda felt firmly connected to the tarmac. Its lateral acceleration fell just shy of the Fit’s, at 0.71 g. The Fit outperformed the Versa in braking, as well, eating up just 130 feet in coming to a stop from 60 mph, with the Nissan requiring an additional six feet. We found the antilock brakes operated far more smoothly in the Fit, with less of a pulsating sensation. The Honda came equipped with standard ABS; the Nissan ABS is an extra-cost option. We found track performance disparities between the cars particularly interesting given the difference in stock tires. The Honda was the one sporting the super cheap rubber, with Dunlop 175/65R-14s all around compared to the Nissan’s slightly more performance-oriented Continental ContiPro Contacts, 185/65R-15s. Had we tested the Fit Sport with its upgraded, 195/55R-15 rubber, we have no doubt the performance margin the Honda displayed over the Versa would have been wider. In terms of fuel economy, the Honda had the Versa beat. The Nissan’s EPA combined 32 mpg falls short of the Fit’s 35 mpg, while on the road we realized the same advantage, with the Honda achieving 34.3 mpg and the Nissan just 31.1. So after an exhausting all-day testing affair where we pushed both little cars to their limits, we have to award the Fit the winner. Where the Honda started out with an apparent disadvantage, at least on paper, when it came to proving itself at the track, the Fit simply outshone the Versa. More Views I like both cars but prefer the Nissan Versa to the Honda Fit. Why? The Versa seems like more of a grown-up car to me; where the Fit has a chintzy quality to it, the Versa simply feels more robust. I also think the Versa’s ride and handling are nothing short of superb. It’s a close call, but I gotta go with the Versa this time. WES RAYNAL This segment couldn’t have blossomed at a better time, whether for the national interest in increased fuel economy or for my personal interest (in perhaps as a ride for my teen boys). If push came to shove, I’d go with the Nissan Versa, maybe precisely because the Honda will get sucked up by the tuner masses. Then again... DUTCH MANDEL The Honda Fit feels a bit more sporty and fun to drive. The fact that it simply looks better is the icing on the cake. I give both of these B-segment cars props for delivering loads of quality and utility in a small package, but I’d rather live with the Fit on a day-to-day basis. PHIL FLORADAY Given the choice of these two, I’d have me a Fit. This despite my impression that the styling is behind the curve because it’s really a few years old (sold elsewhere under the far better name Jazz) and the interior is sub-par. But it drives like a small Honda, and that’s a good thing. Of course, a base Cooper drives like a Mini and that’s a better, if costlier, thing. KEVIN A. WILSON 2007 Honda Fit ENGINE Front-transverse 1.5-liter/91-cid sohc I4 Output: 109 hp @ 5800 rpm, 105 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm Compression ratio: 10.4:1 Fuel requirement: 87 octane DRIVETRAIN Front-wheel drive Transmission: Five-speed manual Final drive ratio: 4.294:1 CHASSIS Unibody five-door wagon DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 96.5 in Track (front/rear): 57.3/57.1 in Length/width/height: 157.4/66.2/60 in Curb weight/GVWR: 2432/3446 lbs SUSPENSION Front: MacPherson struts with coil springs, hydraulic shock absorbers, antiroll bar Rear: Torsion beam with coil springs, hydraulic shock absorbers BRAKES/WHEELS/TIRES Discs front, drum rear, ABS; aluminum 175/65R-14 Dunlop SP31 A/S CAPACITIES Fuel: 10.8 gal Cargo: 21.3 cu ft OPTIONS AS TESTED None STANDING-START ACCELERATION 0-60 mph: 9.30 sec 0-100 km/h (62.1 mph): 9.86 sec 0-quarter-mile: 16.92 sec @ 79.9 mph ROLLING ACCELERATION 20-40 mph (second gear): 3.9 sec 40-60 mph (third gear): 5.8 sec 60-80 mph (fourth gear): 10.0 sec BRAKING 60 mph-0: 130 ft HANDLING 490-foot slalom: 44.2 mph Lateral acceleration (200-foot skidpad): 0.74 g FUEL MILEAGE EPA combined: 35 mpg AW overall: 34.3 mpg INTERIOR NOISE (DBA) Idle: 38 Max first gear: 73 Steady 60 mph: 66 2007 Nissan Versa SL ENGINE Front-transverse 1.8-liter/110-cid dohc I4 Output: 122 hp @ 5200 rpm, 127 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm Compression ratio: 9.9:1 Fuel requirement: 87 octane DRIVETRAIN Front-wheel drive Transmission: Six-speed manual Final drive ratio: 3.933:1 CHASSIS Unibody five-door wagon DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 102.4 in Track (front/rear): 58.3/58.5 in Length/width/height: 169.1/66.7/60.4 in Curb weight/GVWR: 2722/3770 lbs SUSPENSION Front: MacPherson struts with coil springs, gas-charged shock absorbers, antiroll bar Rear: Torsion bar with coil springs, gas-charged shock absorbers, antiroll bar BRAKES/WHEELS/TIRES Discs front, drum rear, ABS; aluminum 185/65R-15 Continental ContiPro Contact CAPACITIES Fuel: 13.2 gal Cargo: 16.9 cu ft OPTIONS AS TESTED ABS package, with antilock braking system, electronic brake force distribution, brake assist ($250) STANDING-START ACCELERATION 0-60 mph: 9.33 sec 0-100 km/h (62.1 mph): 10.02 sec 0-quarter-mile: 16.99 sec @ 81.6 mph ROLLING ACCELERATION 20-40 mph (second gear): 3.8 sec 40-60 mph (third gear): 5.3 sec 60-80 mph (fourth gear): 7.8 sec BRAKING 60 mph-0: 136 ft HANDLING 490-foot slalom: 42.3 mph Lateral acceleration (200-foot skidpad): 0.71 g FUEL MILEAGE EPA combined: 32 mpg AW overall: 31.1 mpg INTERIOR NOISE (DBA) Idle: 41 Max first gear: 75 Steady 60 mph: 64
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
LEVEL UP
|
Yeah, it says that 3 times above.
__________________
2009 Mazdaspeed3 GT 2007 Civic Si Sedan 1994 Accord EX-L "The Luxo-beater" IMMDC2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: columbia, sc
Posts: 2
|
Not a bad looking car for what it is...I hope someone comes out with a macho looking, amazing mpg getting, vehicle soon....I need great gas mileage, but lets face it...I'm not giving up my manhood to get it...
__________________
auto body repair shop columbia, sc |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
2gr84u
|
by the sounds of it you havent acheived manhood, so youve got nothing to lose
__________________
2009 Fit sport daily 1971 Olds Cutlass S project
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Junior Member
|
Thanks for the info.... I think.
__________________
Geo Metro Type-R JDM 3-1 header JDM Type-R Emblem conversion Bling bling hubcaps |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|