![]() |
|
|||||||
| New! Use your Facebook to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1
|
S2K or Nissan Z
Last edited by DC2; 01-25-05 at 04:18 AM. |
|||||||
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
A Philanthropical Fruit
|
S2k in my opinion. Really matters what you're into but I think it's supirior
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I missed Sean
|
k-series s2k>Z>f series s2k
the f series was cool, but i think the high-comp ratio is a lil... well annoying when it comes to boosting, i'd go witht he k series and boost it a lil (if you can find a kit for it, if not make your own)
__________________
1.8L Acura Integra GSR: Back where it belongs. 3.2L Pontiac Tran-sport Montana: that things about to go. 2.2L Honda Accord EX: Sold to my sister 232CI Mercury Sable: Sold to some lady, by my father, while i was on a camping trip. IMM232 http://imagegen.last.fm/minimalDark/..._vigilante.gif |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
lots and lots of fail
|
Quote:
__________________
2003 San Marino Red Accord Coupe EX-V6 6MT IMM244k miles ![]() www.lemons300zx.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
lots and lots of fail
|
Quote:
__________________
2003 San Marino Red Accord Coupe EX-V6 6MT IMM244k miles ![]() www.lemons300zx.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
chris is the devil
|
Quote:
who knows
__________________
05 Acura RSX Type-S Beater- ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Relevance is irrelevant
|
I would take an S2000 over the 350Z any day. But I might actually take a pristine condition 300ZX over the S2000.
More than likely though I would be better with a S2k. My next car is going to be a weekend car and I'll keep the EJ for a daily driver, so I don't need the car to have a back area or trunk type space.
__________________
________________________ 00 Honda Civic EX daily driver 84 Honda Nighthawk CB700 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 220
|
a K series S2000? riiiiiiiiiiiiight...u need to stay off that shit
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
HC Racer H5
|
daily driver - around town cruiser i'd go with a 350z
nice weather sportscar - i'd go with a s2k
__________________
04 Acura TSX (wife's car) 99 Chevrolet Silverado LT (gas guzzler) 89 944S2 (daily driver) 89 Honda ITA Honda Civic (go kart) [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Domestic Driving Asshole
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 422
|
I prefer the 350Z. Why? I like having the extra interior space, I like torque, and I like that blue color.
But, like 98CoupeV6 said, you need to go out and drive them both.
__________________
'02 EB Z06 mods: breathless shifter, k&n intake, air bridge, ported TB, Dynatech headers & X-pipe, dyno tuned (~400 RWHP). 1/4: ??? SOLD: '01 Camaro SS M6
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
I missed Sean
|
Quote:
just checked, its a 2.2 liter, whats the engine code, it's not a RWD h22 is it?? ( we all know the DOHC f20 was a h series in disguise)
__________________
1.8L Acura Integra GSR: Back where it belongs. 3.2L Pontiac Tran-sport Montana: that things about to go. 2.2L Honda Accord EX: Sold to my sister 232CI Mercury Sable: Sold to some lady, by my father, while i was on a camping trip. IMM232 http://imagegen.last.fm/minimalDark/..._vigilante.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Ridin Dirty
|
Quote:
__________________
E36 BMW..Bilstein-UUC-H&R-Turner-Advan-Kosei-CSL 92' si hatch/b16/caged/etc- Sold wagon squad #0001 LCD Squad #0002 4 Door mafia |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
I missed Sean
|
Quote:
bad intrepretation of a bad typo
__________________
1.8L Acura Integra GSR: Back where it belongs. 3.2L Pontiac Tran-sport Montana: that things about to go. 2.2L Honda Accord EX: Sold to my sister 232CI Mercury Sable: Sold to some lady, by my father, while i was on a camping trip. IMM232 http://imagegen.last.fm/minimalDark/..._vigilante.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
lots and lots of fail
|
Quote:
And it's an F22C. K series is FWD.
__________________
2003 San Marino Red Accord Coupe EX-V6 6MT IMM244k miles ![]() www.lemons300zx.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
RAD owns.
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
driver
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,600
|
Quote:
__________________
sig |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,124
|
I'd t ake the 350z over the S2k..........way more fun to drive and i like the added torque
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 70
|
NISSIAN! hahahaha.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
RAD owns.
|
Quote:
Of course, none of this matters to the guy who posted the thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moderator Alumni
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 20,583
|
If you want the car for a pure driving experience that benefits you the most, get the S.
If you want the car that you plan on modifying, then get the Z. It seems you're in the period where you want to be the "top dog" out of your peers, if all you care about is straight-line performance...look into those AWD cars, Mustang, and the like. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,124
|
Quote:
Don't get a mustang they suck.........get a ls1 powered Fbody or a used c5 vette or something |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
ilikebigbuttsnicannotlie!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: T-DOT
Posts: 133
|
i think i'd prefer the s2k
__________________
"she's my sunshine in the rain .. my tylenol when i'm in pain .. yeah .. she's exactly what i need" GET THI$ $$$ <--- GET PAID 2 CLICK LINKS!!GET THI$ $$$ <--- GET PAID 2 GOOGLE!!
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
|
I have a G35C and an '03 S. The G (mostly a Z w/ a back seat) feels like a monster and is lots of fun, great cruizer and has a nice sporty feel to it, but it's a plush HEAVY feeling car that's just not as tossable in turns.
My S continues, as from day ONE to make me smile each time I press that Red button on the Left. Every 9000rpm run with the banshee under the hood wailing at me makes me smile a little wider. She sticks like glue in twisties, and is incredibly nimble. My S is at least a bit faster than the G even though it may not have the visceral thrust in the seat "feel" the G gives (I have the feeling a 350Z probably evens this up to about a crap shoot and who's a better driver). But if you enjoy curves the S is a LOT more confidence inspiring. In the end you just need to ask yourself are you a straight line guy or a curve's guy. Good Luck on your decision. (and Dr. dude, maybe it would be wise to stop regurgitating info you never really digested )
__________________
"Life moves pretty fast, if you don't stop and look around once in a while you could miss it!" |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
My first Honda
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 23
|
Well for what its worth I own an Altima 3.5se. I wanted a fun to drive weekend car and had a choice between a 03 350z and a 2000 S2k. I went with the S2k. It just feels more like what a sport car should feel like. Plus it was over 4k less.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Track Day Club
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: St Charles, IL
Posts: 162
|
You need to decide what it is that you want from your car.
The S2000 is a track-oriented, roadster. The 350Z, even in soft-top, is a grand touring (GT) sportscar. Buy accordingly. BTW, as an S2000 owner, I am stating that IMHO the best sportscar, dollar for dollar, that's available anywhere in the world is the C5 in Z06 configuration.
__________________
'04 S2000 Red/Tan w/Blk HT '00 Accord '00 S2000 Red / Black (track car)(crashed RIP) |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,124
|
Quote:
Yep I'd say that too.......its hard to outperform that car and almost impossible in that price range |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8
|
I'd definitely go with the S, as for the speed these 2 cars are so close it will depend on the drivers. I have heard both sides, the Z is faster, the S is faster, like I said it will depend on the driver, good luck.
bryan www.stwok.com |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 37,270
|
S2000 without a doubt. I think the 350Z is a pig.
__________________
EM2 |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
|
I would go w/ the s for looks etc. It depends also do you want a Honda or Nissan. Value wise S because H's hold better value. Of course Z is faster 287 hp vs 240.Gas mileage the S(4cyl) especially w/ the gas prices today. I feel overall you can do more w/ the S for looks. But, the real deal you should go test drive both & get into it to see which suits you better.Hp,susp. etc.. Good luck Also for NA their's no better sounding engine next to a Stang other than Vtec Baaaaaaaah !!
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 17
|
S2000 is far superior if you can fit in it...I'm 6'5" so I'd go with the Z based on that fact alone. However, the S2000 owns the Z if you can fit in it. The Z actually kinda looks like a failed Porshe design (way too soft) Depends on what you're looking for, it's an open questions so my decision is based on what I can fit in. Later
__________________
2001 Black Prelude, v2 CAI (thanks Casey), looking for a custom exhaust shop! Message me if you know of one in the east bay. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|