Simple: post your recent shots. (snws)
10-25-2009, 02:16 PM
#21
HA.net Workout Krew
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the gym
Posts: 9,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which wide angle L?
10-22 isn't an L and it's not a 2.8 either. Don't worry. Some L glass is coming in due time. Got to make more moneys, but 70-200 2.8 is is next on the list.
that or 85 1.8. not sure yet.
10-22 isn't an L and it's not a 2.8 either. Don't worry. Some L glass is coming in due time. Got to make more moneys, but 70-200 2.8 is is next on the list.
that or 85 1.8. not sure yet.
10-25-2009, 03:16 PM
#22
click click
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: cali
Posts: 23,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anything wider then 16 go with a fish eye and save some money
Last edited by dj02; 10-25-2009 at 03:18 PM.
10-25-2009, 03:41 PM
#23
HA.net Workout Krew
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the gym
Posts: 9,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
h: Maybe if I ball enough to step up to a FF then I'd go with the 17-40. but then you're looking at 2500 for the 5dmkII and another grand for the 17-40 2.8:happysad:
did you move to a full frame?
10-25-2009, 03:46 PM
#24
click click
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: cali
Posts: 23,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-29-2009, 09:26 PM
#30
LEVEL UP
^Shots look good.
Yeah, it's about a half hour drive from me but the scenery is fantastic this time of year. Soon the leaves will all be on the ground though. :wtc:
Thanks, I'll look into getting one. Would one of these work alright with a 50 prime?
Yeah, it's about a half hour drive from me but the scenery is fantastic this time of year. Soon the leaves will all be on the ground though. :wtc:
Thanks, I'll look into getting one. Would one of these work alright with a 50 prime?
Last edited by R_Squared; 10-29-2009 at 09:27 PM.