Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 91 Si vs IS300

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    White Plains, MD
    Posts
    1,321

    91 Si vs IS300

    Just trying to see who would win. I was coming home from work 2day & this dude w/ a IS 300 was messing with me. I didnt want to run since we were on the street. Anyhow at the light I just was reviving my nengine up.
    My 91 Civic Si has a B16A1 (I,E& H) & a chipped ecu. What times would anyone get a the track. Holla

  2. #2
    i would say mid-low 14's, depending on the how good the driver is.
    94 GSR Sedan: SOLD
    New: 95 Eg Hatch VX
    Mods: Custom Intake, Magnaflow Exhaust. Mugen Front Lip, JDM fogs, Amber corners, black vx rims, Mugen Replica Duckbill with brakelight.
    Soon to Come: LS swap

  3. #3
    Still here... sorta... westcoaststyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    17,177
    I think the IS would have taken you. The power/weight ratio is really the only factor to consider in the situation - other than driver ability. The IS is over 200 chp, but is much heavier than the little 91 Si. Even with your i/h/e & chipped ecu (bad mod as it is), I still think the I6 in the IS would take you.
    2008 Lexus IS 350 - Starfire White
    1999 Ford Explorer 4x4 Sport

    View My Feedbacks & ADD TO THEM!!!

  4. #3
    Honda-Acura
    Honda S2000

    Honda-Acura

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for Honda-acura.net content, comments, or advertising. Honda-acura.net is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse Honda-acura.net in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2