![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||||||
|
Junior Member
|
reliability???
|
|||||||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
lots and lots of fail
|
As with all Hondas, the CL will take you to 200,000 miles easily if properly maintained. The only problem is a transmission failure, which occurs in approximately 1.6% of all Accords, Preludes, CLs and TLs sold which all use the same basic transmission. It isn't a widespread issue by any means, but since Hondas have such great reliability, people make a big deal out of it since they have nothing else to make a big deal out of. the CL will not be as reliable as a comparable Toyota/Lexus product, but will be more reliable than anything else. Of course the CL can be driven hard...very hard. If you want to know how it handles, go find a curvy road with it. Being a big car, the 5 speed automatic won't handle as well as a BMW 3 series or a Lexus IS300, but the 6 speed with a Helical Limited Slip Differntial will handle about equally as both of those. And if you throw a set of Potenza S-03's on there...it'll probably outhandle a base 325i. Also, if you're considering the 6 speed, the automatic tranny worries will be nonexistant.
__________________
2003 San Marino Red Accord Coupe EX-V6 6MT IMM244k miles ![]() www.lemons300zx.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: nj
Posts: 22
|
Reiable
I bought a 6-speed 3.2CL Type-S and it's the finest car I've ever owned. Reliabilty issues are almost non-existant for these cars, as verified by Consumer Reports and many current owners. After having a SAAB 9000 Aero, I'm a lot happier not worrying about what will go wrong next!
I agree that manual cars are more reliable and easier to fix if something should go wrong. Basic maintenance is a necissity for any car to live a long life. As for driving hard, the car can take it. But can you're insurance cope? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|